Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22147 (ORI)

KAILASH CHOUDHURY v. COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS ENDOWMENT ,BHUBANESWAR

WP(C)/4339/2026 · 2026-06-25

K R Mohapatra, Sanjay Kumar Mishra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C). No.4339 of 2026 Kailash Choudhury …. Petitioner Mr. Biswajit Sahoo, Advocate on behalf of Mr.Ajit Kumar Mohanty, Advocate -versus- Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments, Bhubaneswar and Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. Manmaya Kumar Dash, (Additional Standing Counsel) Mr. Sangramjeet Senapati, Advocate (for Commissioner of Endowments) CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA ORDER Order No. 25.06.2026 01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- “In the aforesaid circumstances, it is humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit this writ application and issue a RULE NISI calling upon the Opposite Parties to show cause as to why this writ application shall not be allowed and if the Opposite Parties failed to show cause or show insufficient cause, the said Rule may be made absolute and on hearing the parties through their counsel, this Hon'ble Court be further pleased to:- i) Issue appropriate Writ/Writs directing the 0pp. Party No. 2, District Collector & Magistrate, Koraput to issue necessary instruction to 0pp. Party No. 3, Tahasildar, Borigumma who shall act upon the instruction of the 0pp. Party No. 1 dated 18.06.2025 under Annexure-1 so as to given effect to the same in view of the direction of this Hon'ble Court dated p. 2 25.03.2025 in W.P.(C) No. 31875/2024 under Annexure-2 without undue delay. ii) This Hon'ble Court be further pleased to pass such other appropriate Writ/Writs, direction/ directions, order/orders as would be deem fit and proper in favour of the petitioner. And for which act of kindness the Petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray. 3. Mr. Sahoo, learned counsel being authorized by Mr.Mohanty, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that in the meantime there has been an amicable settlement in the matter. Hence, the writ petition has become infructuous. 5. A memo signed by Mr. Mohanty, learned counsel for the Petitioner is filed in Court today in support of the submission of Mr. Sahoo, learned counsel. The memo so filed is taken on record. 6. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. (K.R. Mohapatra) Judge (S.K. Mishra) Judge Himansu