Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22145 (CHH)

HARISHANKAR KUSHWAHA v. NAKUL PRASAD

CRMP/1781/2023 · 2026-06-18

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:25127 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1781 of 2023 1 - Harishankar Kushwaha S/o Balbhadra Kushwaha Aged About 62 Years R/o Rajkishore Nagar, Sarkanda, P.S. Sarkanda, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - Nakul Prasad S/o Shri Rampreet Prasad Aged About 47 Years R/o Talaab Side, Dindayal Colony, Bahatarai Road, P.S. Sarkanda Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - M/s Kusha Trade Through Its Proprietor Shri Awadhesh Singh Kushwala, S/o Hari Shankar Kushwaha, Aged About 33 Years, Address At A/82, Hanuman Gadi, Rajkishore Nagar, Bilaspur District (C.G.) ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Mr. PK Tulsyan, Advocate For Respondent : None. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice (Order on Board) 19.06.2026 1. By filing the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following relief(s):- “It is therefore prayed that the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated 16.08.2021 and 13.04.2023 (Annexure P-1), pending before JMFC, Bilaspur (CG), in Complaint Case No.1523/2021, in the interest of justice.” 2. As per the status report received from the office, the trial has already been concluded on 10.06.2025. In view of the same, the relief VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Digitally signed by VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 sought in the present petition has become infructuous as nothing survives for consideration in this petition by this Court. 3. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No orders as to costs. 4. Interim order, if any stands vacated. 5. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information. sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice vaishali