Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22133 (JHR)

RAHUL KUMAR SONI ALIAS RAHUL SONI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6975/2026 · 2026-07-28

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:22267] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6975 of 2026 ------ Rahul Kumar Soni @ Rahul Soni, aged about 32 years, son of Sri Baijnath Prasad Soni @ Baijnath Soni @ Baijnath Prasad Soni, resident of New Colony Bagicha, Ramgarh, P.O. Ramgarh, P.S. Ramgarh Cantt., District – Ramgarh. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Praveen Shankar Dayal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vineet Kr. Vashistha, Spl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-28-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Gidhour P.S. Case No. 54 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 17(b), 21(b), 27(a), 28, 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in sale and purchase of brown sugar which is also known as Heroin and from the possession of the petitioner, 12.18 grams of brown sugar was recovered while from the co-accused Anand Kumar Thakur taken together, 14.52 grams of brown sugar was recovered. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the seized contraband comes under intermediate quantity. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 11.05.2026 as mentioned in para-8 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, NDPS, Chatra in connection with Gidhour P.S. Case No. 54 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 28.07.2026 Saroj/