Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22121 (AP)

ALTI BUCHHIBABU, VIZIANAGARAM DIST. v. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, A.P.E.P.D.C.L.,VSKPTM., & 4 OTR

WP/1042/2013 · 2026-03-04

Ninala Jayasurya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010340362013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 1042/2013 Between: 1. ALTI BUCHHIBABU, VIZIANAGARAM DIST., OCC: CULTIVATION, R/O. BODDAVARAM (V) S.KOTA MANDAL, VIZIZANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER A P E P D C L VSKPTM 4 OTR, (ANDHRA PRADESH ELECTRICITY POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED) SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER APEPDCL, (ANDHRA PRADESH ELECTRICITY PER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED) MADHURUWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY ENGINEER APEPDCL, (ANDHRA PRADESH ELECTRICITY PER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED) PENDURTHI, VISAKHAPATNAM 4. THE ADDITIONAL ASSISTANT ENGINEER APEPDCL, (ANDHRA PRADESH ELECTRICITY PER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED) PENDURTHI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. THE MANAGEMENT CUM CORRESPONDENT, BHASHYAM GROUP OF SCHOOLS, R/O. BODDAVARAM (V) S.KOTA MANDAL, VIZIZANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): NJS,J W.P No.1042 of 2013 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NARAM NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) 2. P ANAND SESHU (SC FOR APEPDCL) NJS,J W.P No.1042 of 2013 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through online. Also heard Ms. Aishwarya Chowdary, learned Junior Standing Counsel for A.P.E.P.D.C.L. representing respondent Nos.1 to 4. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that as per his instructions, electrical poles are not passing through the subject matter lands. 3. In view of the same, the matter need not be examined in detail. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. Interim orders, if any, granted on the earlier occasion shall stand dissolved. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:05.03.2026 Ksj