Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22117 (JHR)

RAMESH DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5017/2026 · 2026-07-28

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:22242 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5017 of 2026 Ramesh Das, son of Prasadi Das … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, APP --- 03/28.07.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 03.01.2026 in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 01 of 2026, registered under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of the Information Technology Act, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum- Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. However, after the present case, the petitioner has been remanded in another case of similar nature which is Latehar P.S. Case No. 3 of 2026. 4. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that there are numerous crime links against the petitioner of different states found during investigation and two victims have already been identified. 5. To this, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 03.01.2026 and charge-sheet has already been submitted on 30.03.2026. He has submitted that charge-sheet in the present has not been filed in connection with organized crime. 6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that no previous case was instituted against the petitioner prior to the present case and considering the custody of the petitioner since 03.01.2026, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five 2026:JHHC:22242 2 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum- Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 01 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:28.07.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:29.07.2026