( 2026:JHHC:22281 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2627 of 2026 Ranbir Prasad Singh, aged about 48 years, son of late Ishwari Prasad Singh, resident of N-6/6, Telco Colony, P.O. and P.S. Telco, Town Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum, State-Jharkhand ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabhu Dayal Agrawal, Spl. P.P. 02/ 28.07.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with M.G.M., P.S. Case No. 183 of 2025, registered under sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(3), 318(4), 320, 323, 351 (2), 3(5) of BNS, 2023, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class at Jamshedpur. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that sister of the petitioner is the proprietor of M/s Birsa Munda Enterprises and the petitioner has not signed any document. He next submits that dispute is there with regard paying rent of the Piling Rig Machine and payment has been made of Rs. 39 lakh and further month wise rent was to be paid. He next submits that cheque issued by the sister of this petitioner has been dishnoured however, the sister of the petitioner has also made payment. He next submits that arbitration clause is also there in the said agreement. He submits that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 11 of the petition. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations are there of not paying the rent and dishonour of cheque. ( 2026:JHHC:22281 ) 5. Considering that petitioner is not proprietor of M/s Birsa Munda Enterprises and it has been pointed out that sister of the petitioner is proprietor of the said company. The cheque issued by the sister of the petitioner has been dishonoured, however, F.I.R is instituted and Rs. 39 lakh is already paid which is reflected in the F.I.R itself. The dispute is there with regard to non payment of rent amount for the said machine. The arbitration clause is also there in the agreement. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the above named, petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of his surrender / arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class at Jamshedpur, in connection with M.G.M., P.S. Case No. 183 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.28.07.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-