APHC010322082023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 16518/2023 Between: 1. DASARI CHANDRA SEKHAR,, S/O D.J.S RAO AGED ABOUT. 43 YEARS, FLAT NO. 304, LAKSHMI TOWERS, MARUTHI NAGAR, KADAPA TOWN, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRL. SECY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRATARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KADAPA DIVISION. YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, CHINTTAKOMMA DINNE MANDAL. YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondents in including the land in Sy.No. 700-4, an extentof 1.5 acers in Mamillapalli (V), Chinttakomma Dinne (M) YSR Kadapa District. without following due process of law as illegal, unsustainable, untenable against the law, void, arbitrary and violative of Principles of natural justice, and consequently direct the respondents to not to dispossess the petitioners, the above circumstances, having no other efficacious alterative, I am constrained to approach this Hon'ble Court under Article-226 of Constitution of India by way of the present Writ Petition seeking justice IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus or any other apporpiate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondts in including the land in Sy.No. 700¬4, an extent of 1.5 acers, Mamillapalli (V), Chinttakomma Dinne (M), YSR Kadapa District. Petitioner ("Subject Property") the above circumstances, having no other efficacious alterative, I am constrained to approach this Hon'ble 2 Court under Article-226 of Constitution of India by way of the present Writ Petition seeking justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DUGGIRALA SUBASH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.16518 of 2023 ORDER: Despite the writ petition being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it indicates that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 20.01.2026 KBN 4 05 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 16518 of 2023 Date: 20.01.2026 KBN