Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22111 (PAT)

Md. Ladla v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./21521/2026 · 2026-07-03

Satyavrat Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21521 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-410 Year-2025 Thana- SAHARSA SADAR District- Saharsa ====================================================== 1. Md. Ladla S/O Bilo Khalipha R/O Village- Baua Tola Sitamarhi, P.S- Sitamarhi, Distt.- Sitamarhi. 2. Rahima Khatoon W/O Siraj Nut R/O Village- Bataraha Ward No. 26/35, Sharsa Sadar, P.S- Saharsa, Distt.- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Namita Shankar R/O Sakhi Van Stop Senter Sah Mahila Helpline, Saharsa. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Gauri Shankar Gupta- A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 03-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that name of petitioner no.2 is Jameela Khatoon, but then her name in the description portion has been recorded as Rahima Khatoon for the reason that in the learned District Court also she had sought bail as Rahima Khatoon and not Jameela Khatoon. It is further submitted that an application has been filed before the learned District Court in A.B.A. No.702 of 2025 for rectifying her name, but then, the said application is pending. It is also submitted that notices were issued on the informant, but then, service report is awaited. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21521 of 2026(3) dt.03-07-2026 2/2 3. It is next submitted that since petitioner no.2 in the instant anticipatory bail application has been wrongly described, as such, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the entire anticipatory bail application with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh with correct name and address. 4. Permission is accorded. 5. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T