APHC010332992023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 17064 of 2023 Between: 1. PURAM HARISH, S/O SEKHAR, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, RIO NEAR DADARAYAGUNTA, KOTA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DIST 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3. THE KOTA GRAM PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, KOTA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, KOTA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. THE ADDITIONAL ASSISTANT ENGINEER AAE, APSPDCL, KOTA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or Orders more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 5 in interfering with petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the site with an extent of 15 Ankanams or 120 Sq yards comprised in Sy. No 1333 of Kota village and Mandal, Tirupati District without following due process of law and thereby attempting to erect transformers illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from his site with an extent of 15 Ankanams or 120 Sq yards comprised in Sy. no 1333 of Kota village and Mandal, Tirupati District without following due process of law and further direct not to erect transformer in the subject land. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the direction to the respondents nos. 3 to 5, not to erect the transformers in the petitioner’s land existing with an extent of 120 Sq. Yards situated in Sy.No.1333 of Kota Village and Mandal and also not to disposes the petitioner from the subject land of the writ petition on the ground that the subject property is belongs to the petitioner and the father of the petitioner was executed registered settlement deed vide document no.1068 of 2014 dated 15.10.2014 in his favour. 2. The learned Standing Counsel representing the respondent no.5 has produced written instructions passed by the 5th respondent. The written instructions of the 5th respondent indicate that they are not intended to erect the DTR in the petitioner’s land. 3. Recording the submissions of both the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO, J Date:02.02.2026 JAK 39 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 17064 of 2023 Date:02.02.2026 JAK HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MAIN CASE No: W.P. No. 17064 of 2023 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 06. 02.02.2026 TRR, J The present writ petition is closed. (Vide Separate Order) ______ TRR, J JAK