Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22106 (AP)

M/S SHREE MANDALI ENTERPRISES v. SRI G SAI PRASAD

CC/2686/2025 · 2026-02-03

Sumathi Jagadam

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010340062025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2686/2025 Between: 1. M/S SHREE MANDALI ENTERPRISES, NAGAYALANKA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI SANAKA KOTA VENKATA RENUKA RAVI VARA PRASAD. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI G SAI PRASAD, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. 3. SRI G SAI PRASAD, COMMISSIONER, CADA SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, WATER RESOURCES (CADA) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. 4. SRI R MOHAN RAO, SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. SRI KODALI BABU, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (TRANSFERRED) KRISHNA EASTERN DIVISION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. (NOW WORKING AS DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION 2 SUBDIVISION, VIJAYAWADA). 6. 6. SRI B ANJNEYA PRASAD, (PRESENT) EXECUTIVEENGIRIEE VIJAYAWADA, KRISHWA DIVISION, 7. SRI SARIPALLI SRINU, DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION C.A.D. DEPARTMENT, COWTHARAM SUB-DIVISION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience to the order dated 03-04-2025 passed in W.P. No. 2624 of 2025 under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Court Act r/w Article 215 of the Constitution of India, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.2624 of 2025 has been complied with by the respondents. Hence, no further orders are required in this contempt case. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case stands closed. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 04.02.2026 KAS 4 246 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2686/2025 Dated: 04.02.2026 KAS