KARAN TURI ALIAS RAM PRASAD TURI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6956/2026 · 2026-07-28
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22104 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22104 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC: 22216] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.6956 of 2026
------
1. Karan Turi @ Ram Prasad Turi, Aged about – 32 years, S/o. Late Haricharan Turi
2. Raju Maraiya @ Raju Lohra, aged about 31 years, S/o Babulal Lohar
3. Sanju Maraiya @ Sanjay Mistri, Aged about 48 years, S/o. Chutra Maraiya
All R/o. – Bhawanichoki, P.O.- Sahibganj, P.S.- Jirwabari, District- Sahibganj (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Mr. Aman Shekhar, Advocate
Mr. Ashish Kr. Thakur, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-28-07-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Sahibganj (M) P.S. Case No.12 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Section 147, 148, 149, 323, 386, 387, 353 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners, being armed with sticks, bow and arrow indulged in extortion from trucks passing through the village and they used criminal force against the police personnel, deterring them to discharge their duties. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-12 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is then submitted that the
co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 04.06.2026 passed in B.A. No.4980 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and that they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case and will not indulge in collection of any amount from any truck during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 27.06.2026 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj in connection with Sahibganj (M) P.S. Case No.12 of 2022 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case and will not indulge in collection of any amount from any truck during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-28.07.2026-Animesh/