[2026:JHHC:22336] THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7028 of 2026 ------ Ram Murmu, aged about 19 years, Son of Manoj Murmu, resident of Chapar, Barwatola, P.O. + P.S. Burmu, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party. ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Raj Kishor Sahu, Advocate. Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, Addl.P.P Mr. Vivek Kumar Rai, Advocate. Mr. Tej Narayan Dubey, Advocate. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 28-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Budmu P.S. Case No. 82 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103 and 238 of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed murder of Ibrar Ansari and caused disappearance of the evidence of murder by throwing the dead body on a railway track to screen himself and the co-accused persons from the offence of murder. It is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and he has only been implicated in this case on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused – Maresh Marandi and leading to recovery of empty cartridge from the place of occurrence. It is next submitted that there is no ballistic report to suggest that the empty cartridge recovered could have been fired from the country made pistol which has been recovered in connection with this case. It is then submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 03.01.2026 as mentioned in para-07 of the instant bail application. Though, charge- sheet has been submitted but none of the witnesses have been examined. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ranchi, in connection with Budmu P.S. Case No. 82 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 28/07/2026 Amar/