Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:22266] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.6972 of 2026
------ Prashant Kumar @ Advard, aged about 22 years, son of Ravindra Kumar Ravi, resident of Central Bank Gali, P.O. & P.S. Sukhdeo Nagar, District – Ranchi. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Praveen Shankar Dayal, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P.
------
Order No:-02 Dated:-28-07-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sukhdeo Nagar P.S. Case No.36 of 2026 (Sukhdeo Nagar P.S. Case No.36 of 2026(N)(S)) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 111(1) of the B.N.S., 2023, Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Sections 21(a), 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons was involved in illegal possession of 4 grams of brown sugar; which is also known as Heroin and fire arms were also recovered from the co-accused persons but on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused persons, the petitioner has been implicated in this case, to be the person who fled away on seeing police party. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.06.2026 as mentioned in para-10 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 07.05.2026 passed in B.A. No.3795 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case
in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Commissioner-cum- Special Judge, N.D.P.S., Ranchi in connection with Sukhdeo Nagar P.S. Case No.36 of 2026 (Sukhdeo Nagar P.S. Case No.36 of 2026(N)(S)) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 28.07.2026 Saroj/