Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22100 (CHH)

NARENDRA RATHORE & OTHERS v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRR/470/2018 · 2026-06-18

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:24958 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 470 of 2018 1. Narendra Rathore & Others S/o Sheetal Prasad Aged About 43 Years Occupation Service Shiksha Karmi 3 R/o Village Portha, P.S., Tahsil Sakti, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 2. Sheetal Prasad Rathore S/o Dhansai Aged About 73 Years R/o Village Portha, P.S., Tahsil Sakti, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 3. Smt. Ambika Bai W/o Sheetal Prasad Aged About 68 Years R/o Village Portha, P.S., Tahsil Sakti, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 4. Rajendra Kumar S/o Sheetal Prasad Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Harethi Tahsil Sakti District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 5. Ramkumar S/o Dhansai Rathore Aged About 58 Years R/o Village Dongiya, P.S., Tahsil Sakti District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Sakti, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ...Non-applicant(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2026.06.19 19:52:06 +0530 2 For Applicants : None. For Non-applicant/State: Mr. S. S. Baghel, Government Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 19.06.2026 1. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the applicants to press this revision petition. 2. Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State/non-applicant, is present. 3. The present revision petition has been filed by the applicants with the following prayer: “It is therefore, prayed that revision petition may kindly be allowed and the order passed by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa in Criminal Case No. 223 of 2017 may kindly be set-aside and consequently the charge- sheet may also be quashed, in the interest of justice.” 4. As per the status report received, the trial was concluded on 26.03.2021. In view of the same, the relief sought in the present petition has become infructuous, and nothing survives for consideration by this Court in the present petition. 5. Consequently, the present revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 3 7. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Brijmohan