Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22099 (PNJ)

SANJIV KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/29314/2026 · 2026-05-29

N S Shekhawat

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

AMIT RANA 2026.05.29 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judgement/order CRM M-29314-2026 2 working as a caretaker of the godown and the actual delivery and transportation of gas cylinder was done by the employees of the agency. Consequently, there was no question of misappropriation of gas cylinders by the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner was arrested in the present case on 2nd April 2026 and is in custody since since then and the challan has been presented against him. 3. On the other hand, learned State counsel assisted by the learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner on the ground that there are serious allegations against the petitioner and the petitioner is not entitled for the concession of regular bail. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 5. In the present case, the petitioner is stated to be in custody since 2nd April 2026, and after completion of investigation, the challan has already been presented against the petitioner. Moreover, the petitioner is a first-time offender and is a physically handicapped. 6. In view of the above, without commenting any further on the merits, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court/Duty Magistrate/CJM concerned. 29.05.2026 ((((NNNN....SSSS....SSSSHHHHEEEEKKKKHHHHAAAAW W W WAAAATTTT)))) amit rana JJJJUUUUDDDDGGGGEEEE Whether reasoned/speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No AMIT RANA 2026.05.29 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judgement/order