Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:22256 ) THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Revision No. 830 of 2026 Sujay Dey @ Sanjay Dey, son of Kasturi Vijay Dey, resident of House No. 28, Uliyan, PO. & P.S. Kadma, Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Raj Kumar Rajak, son of Shive Prasad Rajak, resident of Golpahari, Khasmahal, P.O. Tatanagar, P.S. Parsudih, Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum … Opposite Parties --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kr. Dubey, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. J.N. Upadhyay, Advocate --- Order No. 04 Dated 28th July, 2026 This application is directed against the judgment dated 28.01.2025 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur in Criminal Appeal No. 90 of 2024, whereby and whereunder, the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 30.03.2024 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur in Complaint Case C/1 Case No. 370 of 2021, convicting the petitioner for the offence punishable u/s 138 N.I. Act and sentencing him to undergo S.I. for one year along with a fine of Rs. 4,33,000/-, has been affirmed. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset that during the pendency of this revision application, the matter has been compromised between the parties and in support of such contention reference has been made to a joint compromise petition which has been brought on record vide Filing No. 12365 of 2026. Mr. Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in terms of the compromise an amount of Rs. 4,33,000/- was the amount which has been arrived at towards full and final settlement between the petitioner and the opposite party No. 2 and the same has been extended to the opposite party No. 2. Mr. J.N. Upadhyay, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party No. 2 has accepted the factum of compromise as well the receiving of an amount of Rs. 4,33,000/- from the petitioner by the opposite party No. 2 and has stated that he does not have any objection if the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. Regard being had to the fact that the offence in question is compoundable in nature and the matter has been compromised between both the sides, subsequent to which an amount of Rs. 4,33,000/- as agreed upon has already been extended by the petitioner to the opposite party No. 2, the judgment dated 28.01.2025 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur in Criminal Appeal No. 90 of 2024 and the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 30.03.2024 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur in Complaint Case C/1 Case No. 370 of 2021, are hereby set aside. This criminal revision application stands disposed of and the pending I.A., if any, also stands closed. (RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, J.) 28.07.2026 MK Page-2