$~104 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010484592026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1857/2026 & CM APPL. 69689-69692/2026 PAVIT SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. versus SANJEEV KHIRWAR, COMMISSIONER, MCD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manu Chaturvedi, Standing Counsel for MCD. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 07.10.2026 1. The Contempt Petition has been filed under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Sections 2(b)/12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 has been filed for contempt of the Judgment dated 21.01.2026 in W.P (C) 813/2026, the Petitioner has annexed a list of the property which according to him have unauthorised construction and there need to be remove the list is of 89 areas. 2. In the impugned Judgment, in paragraph 7 it was observed that the Petitioner is at liberty to move a separate representation in respect of each property against which the action of demolition of unauthorised construction is required to be taken. 3. This kind of omnibus complaint mentioning of 89 areas in Delhi, cannot be an effective way to ensure the relief, which the Petitioner is seeking. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/10/2026 at 10:46:48 4. The Petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to make a detailed representation in respect of each of the property, after which the action shall be taken by the MCD in terms of the order dated 21.01.2026. 5. The Petition along with Pending applications, are accordingly, disposed of. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J OCTOBER 7, 2026/dss This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/10/2026 at 10:46:48