SMT SAVITHA v. SHRI VARUN SOUHARDA CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE LIMITED
CRL.RP/95/2026 · 2026-06-16
H P Sandesh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22095 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22095 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29216 CRL.RP No. 95 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 95 OF 2026 BETWEEN:
SMT. SAVITHA W/O LATE GIRISH H AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS NO.724, NEAR BMTC BUS STAND, NEAR HESARUGHATTA VILLAGE HESARUGHATTA HOBLI BANGALORE-560088. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.T. RANGASWAMY, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
SHRI VARUN SOUHARDA CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE LIMITED (REP. BY ITS ASSISTANT LOAN RECOVERY OFFICER) NO.617, 4TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN ROAD, HANUMANTHANAGAR BENGALURU-560019. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. ANITHA K.R., ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C (U/S 438 R/W 442 OF BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HON'BLE LXII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT BANGALORE (CCH-63) IN CRL.A.NO.1305/2023 DATED 10.12.2025 BY CONFIRM THE JUDGEMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION AGAINST THE
Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29216 CRL.RP No. 95 of 2026
RESPONDENT PASSED BY THE HON'BLE XL ACMM, AT BANGALORE IN CC.NO.30978/2021 DATED 07.08.2023.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
ORAL ORDER
1. This revision petition is filed against the judgment in C.C. No.30978/2021, wherein the trial Court ordered that accused shall pay fine of ₹18,00,000/- and in default, he shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months and the same is challenged before the appellate Court and appellate Court also having reassessed the material, confirmed the same. The said
order is challenged in this revision petition.
2. This Court by order dated 11.02.2026, suspended the sentence subject to payment of 50% of fine amount inclusive of the amount already paid within a period of six weeks and when the matter is listed before this Court on 08.06.2026, the revision petitioner was absent Again this Court directed the counsel for the revision petitioner to verify and submit 'whether the conditional order dated 11.02.2026 is complied or not?' and
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29216 CRL.RP No. 95 of 2026
also to verify that if the counsel fails to comply the same on the next date of hearing, the revision petition will be dismissed.
3. In spite of it learned counsel for the revision petitioner is not appeared before the Court and also not made any submission regarding compliance and the petitioner's counsel is also not pursuing the matter and with regard to compliance also there is no submission.
4. This revision is also against the concurrent findings and revision petition is not admitted and hence, when such being the case, question of consideration of revision petition does not arise. Hence revision petition is dismissed for non-pursuing the matter and for non-compliance.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
BS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33