Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22095 (JHR)

SACHINDRA KUMAR DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5522/2026 · 2026-07-28

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:22276 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5522 of 2026 Sachindra Kumar Das, son of Bishnu Das … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Ms. Kumari Rashmi, APP --- 05/28.07.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 03.01.2026 in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 01 of 2026, registered under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) & 84(C) of the Information Technology Act, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge- II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. However, the petitioner has criminal antecedents being Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No. 135 of 2024, Jangipur Cyber crime P.S. Case No. 32 of 2024 and Latehar Cyber P.S. Case No. 03 of 2026. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that so far as Latehar Cyber P.S. Case No. 03 of 2026 is concerned, the same has been instituted after the present case. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for bail and has referred to the criminal antecedent report of the petitioner and has submitted that there are numerous crime links found against the petitioner relating to different states. 6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the numerous crime links found against the petitioner and also the other criminal cases instituted against the petitioner which are of similar nature, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on 2026:JHHC:22276 2 bail and hence, this bail application is rejected. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:28.07.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:29.07.2026