Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22094 (KAR)

SRI. RAVI KUMAR v. THE REVENUE DEPARTMENT

WP/22670/2022 · 2026-06-17

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29465 WP No. 22670 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 22670 OF 2022 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAVI KUMAR S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/A ARDESANAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562110. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHOKKAREDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE REVENUE DEPARTMENT REPTD BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY VIKAS SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE THASILDAR GRADE - II DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-560 110. 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION DODDABALLAPURA BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561 203. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29465 WP No. 22670 of 2022 4. SRI. JAYASHANKAR S/O B N NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/A NO.15, BYREGOWDA LAYOUT VINAYAKA VIDHYA KENDRA BENGALURU-560092. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. H.N. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE-A ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE MR.T.2/2022-23, DATED 16.07.2022, IN FAVOUR OF RESPONDENT NO.4 IN RESPECT OF THE SY.NO.26/2 MEASURING 5 ACRE 30 GUNTAS, SITUATED AT ARADESHANAHALLI VILLAGE, KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT AND RESTORE THE REVENUE ENTRIES AS EARLIER MR 3/1999-2000 AS ANNEXURE - D1 BY ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29465 WP No. 22670 of 2022 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 16.07.2022 (Annexure-A) passed by the respondent No.2. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the controversy regarding the subject land, in respect of which Form No. 7 has been filed by the respondents, which is pending consideration in W.P. No. 36190 of 2015. 4. In that view of the matter, Respondent No. 2, in the proceedings bearing No. RRT(dis) 122/2015- 16, observed that the subject matter of the writ petition is pending consideration before this Court and, therefore, did not proceed further in the matter. In the circumstances, it is open to the petitioner to approach Respondent No. 2 after the conclusion of the proceedings in W.P. No. 36190 of 2015. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29465 WP No. 22670 of 2022 With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7