RONIT GANJHU @ ROHIT KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6955/2026 · 2026-07-28
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22092 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22092 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC: 22217] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.6955 of 2026
------ Ronit Ganjhu @ Ronit Kumar, aged about 20 years son of Naresh Ganjhu Resident of village Benti, P.O. and Police Station- Piparwar, District- Chatra
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kr. Chaturvedy, Advocate
Mr. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-28-07-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Piparwar P.S. Case No.15 of 2026 (S.T. No.225 of 2026) registered for the offences punishable under Section 317(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 25 (1-B) (a), 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of the Criminal law Amendment Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, being member of extremist organization namely T.S.P.C., assembled at village Benti but on seeing the police personnel, while trying to flee away by motorcycle, were apprehended by police. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-15 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that except one criminal antecedent, the petitioner is not involved in any other case. It is then submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 02.07.2026 passed in B.A. No.6124 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the
case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 18.03.2026 as has been mentioned in para-11 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Chatra in connection with Piparwar P.S. Case No.15 of 2026 (S.T. No.225 of 2026) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-28.07.2026-Animesh/