COCP-2685-2026 127 Mukesh Kumar and others Anurag Rastogi and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN Present: Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Haryana, for the respondents. HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN, J. 1. 2026 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Mukesh Kumar and others versus Anurag Rastogi and others HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Haryana, for the respondents. HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN, J. (ORAL) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2685-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.05.2026 .....…Petitioners ........Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Haryana, (ORAL) ATUL SETHI 2026.05.30 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh COCP-2685-2026 2. As p examine individual cases of the writ petitioners for regularization, keeping in view the policy mentioned therein. It has been further directed that quo with regard to the working of the employe the orders are passed by the authorities. 3. Learned State counsel stated that the case of the petitioner be considered in the light of the aforesaid order passed by the Division Bench of this Court. 4. In view of the above facts and circumstances, present petition is disposed of at this stage having rendered taken within six months by the respondents in the matter of the petitioner, in terms of the aforesaid order pas liberty to seek revival of this petition or file a afresh petition. 5. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. 27.05.2026 atulsethi Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2026 (O&M) -2- As per the aforesaid order, the State has been directed to examine individual cases of the writ petitioners for regularization, keeping in view the policy mentioned therein. It has been further directed that with regard to the working of the employe the orders are passed by the authorities. Learned State counsel stated that the case of the petitioner be considered in the light of the aforesaid order passed by the Division Bench of this Court. In view of the above facts and circumstances, present petition is disposed of at this stage having rendered infructuous taken within six months by the respondents in the matter of the petitioner, in terms of the aforesaid order passed in the LPA, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of this petition or file a afresh petition. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN) Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : er the aforesaid order, the State has been directed to examine individual cases of the writ petitioners for regularization, keeping in view the policy mentioned therein. It has been further directed that status with regard to the working of the employees would be maintained till Learned State counsel stated that the case of the petitioners shall be considered in the light of the aforesaid order passed by the Division In view of the above facts and circumstances, present petition is infructuous. In case no decision is taken within six months by the respondents in the matter of the petitioner, in sed in the LPA, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of this petition or file a afresh petition. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No er the aforesaid order, the State has been directed to examine individual cases of the writ petitioners for regularization, keeping status es would be maintained till shall be considered in the light of the aforesaid order passed by the Division In view of the above facts and circumstances, present petition is . In case no decision is taken within six months by the respondents in the matter of the petitioner, in sed in the LPA, the petitioner would be at ATUL SETHI 2026.05.30 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh