IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MMO No. 820 of 2026 Date of Decision : 7.9.2026 Vijay Kumar @ Jagdish Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & ors. ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Abhilash Thakur, Advocate. For respondents No.1 to 3/State : Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate General. For respondent No.4 : Nemo. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that all the offences are compoundable and therefore, he wants to withdraw the present petition and to approach the learned Trial Court. Hence, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to approach the learned Trial Court, if so advised. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 Learned Trial Court shall decide the matter without being influenced by the withdrawal of the present petition before this Court. The pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 7th September, 2026 (Chander)