46-ba-1002-26.doc Urmila Ingale IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1002 OF 2026 Vinod Laxman Gaikwad .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and anr. .. Respondents ....................  Mr. Vipul Dushing a/w Mr. Tanmay Kate and Mr. Ashraf Kazzi, Advocates for Applicant.  Mr. Harshwardhan Patil – Appointed Advocate (through VC), for Respondent No.2.  Mr. Yogesh Nakhwa, APP for Respondent-State. ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : AUGUST 19, 2026 P.C. : 1. Heard Mr. Dushing, learned Advocate for Applicant, Mr. Nakhwa, learned APP for Respondent No.1-State and Mr. Patil, learned Advocate for the Respondent No.2 appointed through legal aid and 2. After hearing Mr. Dushing, equally Mr. Nakhwa and Mr. Patil and expressing my mind, Mr. Dushing would persuade the Court to allow the Applicant to withdraw the present Application reserving the leave and liberty to approach the Court in accordance with law. 3. Reserving that leave and liberty, Bail Application is dismissed. Urmila Ingale [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] 1 of 1 URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Digitally signed by URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Date: 2026.08.20 11:21:36 +0530