[ 2026:JHHC:22246] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6997 of 2026 Suraj Kumar Yadav @ Golu, aged about 21 years, son of Mantu Prasad yadav, Resident of Khoradah, Bompas Town, P.O. & P.S. Deoghar Town, District Deoghar … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar , Adv. For the State : Mr. Jitendra Pandey , Addl. PP 02 / 28.07.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Kunda P.S. Case No. 68 of 2026 instituted under Section 111(2) (b), 109(1), 61 (2) of the B.N.S. Act and under section 27 of the Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused persons attempted to commit murder of Abhishek Yadav. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that in the FIR, there is direct and specific allegation that the co-accused Shivam Raj has fired upon the victim and the petitioner has been implicated in this case only because he was present at the place of occurrence. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.9 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 05.06.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no.10 of the bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case. It is next submitted that the co-accused with similar allegations has already been admitted on bail by this court vide order dated 21.07.2026 in B.A. No. 6784 of 2026 hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar in connection with Kunda P.S. Case No. 68 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 28.07.2026 Smita/-