APHC010330162018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] SATURDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1248/2018 Between: 1. THE CORRESPONDENT V.N.AIDED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, AROGYAPURAM,TSUNDUPALLE MANDAL,YSR KAPAPA DISTRICT,REP BY IS CORRESPONDENT,D RAM SUNEEL REDDY, S/O HARINATH REDDYM,AGED 45 YEAR,R/O TSUNDUPALLE MANDAL,YSR KADAPA DISTRICT-516129. ...PETITIONER AND 1. ADITYANATH DAS, PRESENTLY SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION (PS.I) DEPARTMENT,GOVT. OF AP,SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI,GUNTUR, 2. SANDHYA RANI, COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION GOVT OF AP,IBRAHIMPATNAM VIJAYAWADA., 3. B PRATAP REDDY, REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR SCHOOL EDUCATION YSR KADAPA DISTRICT KADAPA 4. P SAILAJA, DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFIER YSR KADAPA DISTRCIT KADAPA ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to to punish the respondents herein for willfully and deliberately 2 violating the order passed by HIs Lordship Sri Justice P Naveen Rao in WPMP NO 46875 of 2017 in WP 37756 of 2017 dated 10.11.2017 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T V S KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. K V RAGHU VEER 2. 3 The court made the following ORDER: The contempt case has been filed alleging wilful violation and disobedience of the interim orders dated 10.11.2027, passed in W.P.M.P.No.46875 of 2017 in W.P.No.37756 of 2017. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri D.Subba Rao, learned counsel representing Sri. T.V.S.Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the main writ petition itself was disposed of vide order dated 24.12.2025. He further submits that in view of the disposal of the writ petition, the petitioner is not inclined to pursue the instant contempt case which is filed against the interim orders dated 10.11.2017. Hence, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no further orders are required in the present case and requested to close the instant contempt case. 3. Considering the submissions made that the writ petition itself is disposed of and the petitioner is not inclined to pursue the instant contempt case, the contempt case is closed. 4. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 07.03.2026 BSP 4 45 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE No.1248 of 2018 Date: 07.03.2026 BSP