Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29044 RPFC No. 28 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 28 OF 2024 BETWEEN:
SRI SANTHOSH B., S/O M R BASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT HOUSE NO. 90, 1ST FLOOR,16TH CROSS, 6TH MAIN ROAD, B BLOCK, J.P NAGAR, MYSURE-570004. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. G.M. SHARATH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. SUMA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SMT SUSHMITHA M D W/O SANTHOSH B D/O DORESWAMY M G AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
2.
YASHIKA S D/O SANTHOSH B AGED ABOUT 2 YEARS, BEING REP BY HER MOTHER MADRAHALLI VILLAGE, Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29044 RPFC No. 28 of 2024 MUGUR HOBLI, T NARASHIPURA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT-570004. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. DILIP KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
(R2 IS MINOR REP. BY R1)
THIS RPFC FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY COURT ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 25.11.2023 PASSED IN CRL.MISC.NO.557/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL FAMILY JUDGE, MYSURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 OF Cr.P.C FOR MAINTENANCE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR 'REPORTING SETTLEMENT, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER
Sri.G.M.Sharath Kumar representing Ms.Suma, learned counsel on record for petitioner submits that matter is settled amicably between the parties and petitioner and respondent are residing together.
Learned counsel thereby seeks permission to withdraw the revision petition. Memo to that effect is also filed.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29044 RPFC No. 28 of 2024
2. Having considered the submission made and the contents of the memo, permission as prayed for is accorded.
3. Revision petition is thereby dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Sri.Sharath Kumar G.M., representing the petitioner submits that petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the amount deposited by him. Sri.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel for respondents reports no objection to permit the petitioner for withdrawal of the amount which he has deposited.
5. Therefore, permission is accorded to the petitioner to withdraw the amount which he has deposited in this case. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE AP CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 57