- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29763 W.P. No.22166/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.22166/2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. D.R. SIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS S/O LATE RACHAIAH R/AT DOOR NO.16, 1ST CROSS TELECOM COLONY, NEAR JALAPURI MAHADEVAPURA MAIN ROAD MYSURU 570 019. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANDRAKANTH R. GOULAY, ADV.,) AND: SRI. KRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS S/O LATE RACHAIAH R/AT DANAYAKANAPURA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI T. NARASIPURA TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT 571124. …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT KRISHNAIAH – SD AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER IN M.A NO.6/2022, ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, T NARASIPURA, DATED 10.10.2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-G AND TO DISMISS THE APPEAL IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY & ETC. Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29763 W.P. No.22166/2022 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has rendered infructuous. To that effect, he has also filed a memo. The said memo reads as under: “The parties have arrived at a settlement before the Lok Adalat, and consequently, O.S.No.196/2021 filed by the petitioner herein came to be dismissed as not pressed on 14.09.2024. Therefore, the relief sought in the present writ petition does not survive for consideration hence, the matter has become infructuous and may be disposed of accordingly, in the interest of justice”. 2. In view of the aforesaid memo, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE RV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46