Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL.M.C. 7772/2026
Page 1 of 2 pages $~70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI %
Date of Decision: 13.10.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010496932026 + CRL.M.C. 7772/2026 & CRL.M.A. 32388/2026
ASHOK & ORS.
.....Petitioners Through: Mr. Anil Pandey, Advocate (through videoconferencing) with petitioners in person
versus
STATE THROUGH ITS SHO & ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Mohit
Respondents no. 2 and 3 in person
CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 205/2017 of PS Tilak Nagar for offence under Section 308/323/341/506/34 IPC on the ground that the respondents no. 2 and 3 have compromised the disputes with the petitioners.
2. Learned APP for State, assisted by IO/SI Mohit, accepts notice and strongly opposes the petition taking me through MLCs of respondents no. 2 and 3, reflecting multiple injuries, including fracture of skull. GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4 5569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d155 70996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e2 6fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.10.13 17:34:15 +05'30'
CRL.M.C. 7772/2026
Page 2 of 2 pages
3.
Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the respondents no. 2 and 3 are neighbours of petitioners and they have compromised the disputes without any monetary settlement, so the present FIR may be quashed.
4. Keeping in mind the extremely serious injuries inflicted on the respondents no. 2 and 3 by petitioners using iron rods, which were to such an extent that caused skull fracture, I do not find it a fit case to invoke inherent powers for quashing the subject FIR. The intensity of blows was so severe that it fractured the strongest bone of the human body and could have even been fatal. Exercise of inherent jurisdiction to quash such FIRs would certainly be not justified.
5. Therefore, the petition and the accompanying application are dismissed.
GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) OCTOBER 13, 2026/as GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45 569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa , cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.10.13 17:34:04 +05'30'