( 2026:JHHC:22275 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 4128 of 2026 1. Tipan Verma @ Tipan Mahto, aged about 53 years, son of late Toko Mahto 2. Kamdev Prasad Verma @ Kamdev Verma, aged about 42 years, son of Prameshwar Mahto 3. Bhola Prasad Veram @ Bhola Verma, aged about 48 years, son of Parmeshwar Mahto 4. Prameshwar Mahto, aged about 60 years, son of late Toko Mahto 5. Santosh Verma @ Santosh Prasad Verma, aged about 38 years, son of late Umar Mahto 6. Dhaneshwar Mahto, aged about 56 years, son of late Umar Mahto 7. Vishnu Mahto, aged about 71 years, son of late Nanhku Mahto 8. Munni Devi, aged about 36 years, wife of Santosh Prasad Verma 9. Malti Devi @ Malwa Devi, aged about 52 years, wife of Dhaneshwar Mahto 10. Chohani Devi, aged about 71 years, wife of Vishnu Mahto 11. Tilki Devi @ Masomat Tilki Devi, aged about 84 years, son of late Umar Mahto 12. Kaili Devi, aged about 51 years, wife of Nilkanth Mahto 13. Sangita Devi, aged about 31 years, wife of Laxman Verma 14. Pramila Devi @ Pramila Kumar, aged about 52 years, wife of Tipan Mahto 15. Simpa Kumari, aged about 27 years, wife of Bhuneshwar Verma 16. Champa Devi, aged about 44 years, wife of Bhola Prasad Verma 17. Runa Devi, aged about 43 years, wife of Kamdev Prasad Verma 18. Mandodari Devi, aged about 36 years, wife of Suresh Prasad Verma All are resident of village Garayandih, P.O. Saranda, P.S. Birni, District- Giridih ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, Advocate For the Informant : M/s Laxman Kumar & Gopeshwar Singh 02/ 28.07.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Birni P.S. Case No. 102 of 2026 registered under sections 191(2) (3), 115(2), 118(2), 324(5), 109(1), 326(F), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of BNS Act pending in the Court of learned C.J.M, Giridih. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners and informant are agnates and due to previous enmity the present case has been ( 2026:JHHC:22275 ) lodged. He next submits that earlier the petitioners side filed complaint case and thereafter the present case has been lodged. He next submits that injury is simple in nature. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsels for the State and informant oppose the prayer and submit that allegations of assault are there and pursuant to that injury has been received by the wife of the informant. 5. On perusal of F.I.R, it transpires that there are general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons and it has been pointed out that both sides are agnates and firstly petitioners side filed the complaint case and thereafter the present case has been lodged. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M, Giridih, in connection with Birni P.S. Case No. 102 of 2026, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.28.07.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-