Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22068 (JHR)

RAVI SINGH ALIAS RAVI SINGH DHAKRE v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.Rev./532/2026 · 2026-07-28

Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation 2026:JHHC:22224 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No. 532 of 2026 Ravi Singh @ Ravi Singh Dhakre, S/o Girraj Singh, R/o 25/172, line no. 11,12, Patel Nagar, Jeoni Mandi, Belan Ganj, Kiraoli, P.O.- Johns Mill, P.S.- CHATTA, Dist.- Agra, Uttar Pradesh. --- --- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Jhalak Roy Maulick, S/o Subrata Roy Maulick, R/o Near Devi Mandir, Bhawanipur, Doranda, P.O. & P.S.- Doranda, Ranchi. --- --- Opposite Parties --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. For the State : Spl. P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Surya Prakash, Adv. --- 04/28.07.2026 Heard Mr. Amit Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Spl. P.P. as well as Mr. Surya Prakash, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 2. This application is directed against the order dated 18.06.2024 passed by the learned Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi in Criminal Appeal No. 152/2024, whereby and whereunder, the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 20.04.2024 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ranchi in Complaint Case No. 10546/2021 convicting the petitioner for the offence under Section 138 NI Act and sentenced him to simple imprisonment for one year along with a fine of Rs. 6,00,000/- has been affirmed. It has been submitted by Mr. Amit Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter has been compromised between the parties during the pendency of this revision application and the terms and conditions have been laid out I.A. No. 985 of 2026. It has been submitted that Rs. 3,50,000/- was the amount which was arrived at towards final settlement between the petitioner and opposite party no. 2 Neutral Citation 2026:JHHC:22224 and which has already been extended to the opposite party no. 2. Mr. Surya Prakash, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has accepted the factum of compromise and has also submitted that the entire amount as agreed upon has been received by the opposite party no. 2. Regard being had to the fact that a compromise has been effected between the parties and the terms and conditions of the compromise have been fully adhered to and the fact that the offence is compoundable in nature, this application stands allowed and the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 20.04.2024 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ranchi in Complaint Case No. 10546/2021 and the order dated 18.06.2024 passed by the learned Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi in Criminal Appeal No. 152/2024 are hereby set aside on the basis of the compromise. This application is allowed. Pending I.A.(s), if any, stands closed. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Dated- 28th July, 2026. Preet/- Uploaded on: 29 /07/2026.