Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22067 (AP)

SYED RIYAZ AHMED v. SHAHAVER BEGUM

CMA/1134/2014 · 2026-01-05

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, Ravi Nath Tilhari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010336292014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1134/2014 Between: 1. SYED RIYAZ AHMED, S/O SYED MAHBOOB SHAREEF, AGED ABOUT 33 YRS, OCC: SOFTWARE ENGINEER, I.B.M., R/O D.NO. 1/2206, A.P.H.B. COLONY, KADAPA CITY, YSR DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. SHAHAVER BEGUM, D/o M.D. Hafizullah, Aged about 28 yrs, Muslim, R/o D.NO. 7/164, N.G.O. Colony, Kadapa City, Y.S.R. District. ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against ordersto allow the Appeal setting aside the order passed in G.O.P. No. 78 OF 20120, dated 14-11-2014, passed by Learned Principal District Judge, Kadapa, Y.S.R. District IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CMAMP 1946 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CMAMP 833 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct to allow the petitioner to take the minor along with him to his residence bearing No. 1/2206 APHB Colony, KAdapa City, YSR District on any one Sunday in a Month from 11.00 am to 5.00 pm Counsel for the Appellant: 1. MOHAMMAD ADNAN Counsel for the Respondent: 1. P GIRI KRISHNA The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1134/2014 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) The petition filed by the father seeking appointment as guardian of minor child as well as other reliefs under Order 39(d)(g) of Guardian and Wards Act was dismissed by the learned Principal District Judge, Kadapa. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal was preferred by the father. 2. During the pendency of the appeal, the minor child have attained majority. 3. Since the minor child now attained majority, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J Dated: 06.01.2026 AG 74 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1134/2014 Dated: 06.01.2026 AG