GURWINDER KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/6408/2026 · 2026-05-29
Vinod S Bhardwaj
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22059 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22059 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 117
CRWP-6408-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 29.05.2026
Gurwinder Kaur and another
...Petitioners VERSUS State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
Present :- Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.
*****
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)
The petitioners namely Gurwinder Kaur and Rashpal have approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of their lives and personal liberty from the private respondents. The contention of the petitioners is that both are major, aged 26 years and 31 years respectively and they have performed marriage against the wishes of their parents. In support thereof, copy of the Aadhaar Cards pertaining to the petitioners have been appended. The marriage of the petitioners was solemnized on 25.05.2026 as per Hindu rites and rituals. A copy of Marriage Certificate has also been appended as Annexure P-3. The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim that there is a constant danger of them being implicated in a false case.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that a representation dated 25.05.2026 (Annexure P-5) has also been submitted by the petitioners to the respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, SBS Nagar and he confines he prayer that the representation may be examined.
SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.05.29 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 117 CRWP-6408-2026(O&M)
Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only. Pursuant to supply of advance copy, Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. He submits that he has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite protection to the petitioners is given. Having heard the counsel for the parties, the present petition is being disposed of without examining the question of legality and validity of the marriage and expressing any opinion thereon, with a direction to respondent No.3- Station House Officer, Police Station Rahon, District SBS Nagar to look into the grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also expressed in the representation dated 25.05.2026 (Annexure P-5) and take appropriate action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances. However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is registered against the petitioners, nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in respect thereof in accordance with law. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with copy of the petition and above-said representation to respondent No.3- Station House Officer, Police Station Rahon, District SBS Nagar Sahib for requisite compliance.
(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 29.05.2026
JUDGE Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.05.29 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document