- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29604 CRL.RP No. 663 of 2022 C/W CRL.RP No. 713 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 663 OF 2022 C/W CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 713 OF 2022 IN CRL.RP No. 663/2022 BETWEEN: 1. M/S BHUWALKA STEEL INDUSTRIES LIMITED, BHUWALKA CENTRE NO.71, III CROSS, RESIDENCY ROAD BENGALURU-560 025. 2. MR AJAYBHUWALKA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S/O LATE SURESH KUMAR BHUWALKA,DIRECTOR M/S BHUWALKA STEEL INDUSTRIES LIMITED, BHUWALKA CENTRE, NO.71, III CROSS,RESIDENCY ROAD, BENGALURU-560 025. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VAIDYA RAVI LAXMINARAYANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S SAMAD HOUSE A PARTNERSHIP FIRM Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29604 CRL.RP No. 663 of 2022 C/W CRL.RP No. 713 of 2022 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.59, BOWRING HOSPITAL ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. REP BY HIS SPA HOLDER MR NAIZ AHMED S/O ABDUL SHUKOOR AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SYED AKMAL HASAN RAZVI, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE PASSED BY LII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT BENGALURU CITY (CCH-53) IN CRL. A. NO. 639/2018 DATED 21.03.2022 IN CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE PASSED BY THE XXIV ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES AND XXII ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE (SCCH-26), AT BANGALORE DATED 23.03.2018, IN C.C. NO. 1082/2015 AND TO ACQUIT THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED FROM THE ABOVE CASE. IN CRL.RP NO.713/2022 BETWEEN: 1. M/S BHUWALKA STEEL INDUSTRIES LILMITED,BHUWALKA STEEL INDUSTRIES LIMITED BHUWALKA CENTRE, NO 71, III CROSS,RESIDENCY ROAD, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29604 CRL.RP No. 663 of 2022 C/W CRL.RP No. 713 of 2022 BENGALURU- 560 025. 2 MR AJAY BHUWALKA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S/O LATE SURESH KUMAR BHUWALKA,DIRECTOR M/S BHUWALKA STEEL INDUSTRIES LIMITED. BHUWALKA CENTRE, NO.71, III CROSS, RESIDENCY ROAD, BENGALURU-560 025. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. VAIDYA RAVI LAXMINARAYANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S SAMAD HOUSE A PARTNESHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGISTRED OFFICE AT NO 59,BOWRING HOSPITAL ROAD BANGALORE 560 001 REP.BY ITS SPA HOLDER, MR NAIZ AHMED S/O ABDUL SHUKOOR AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS ...RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SYED AKMAL HASAN RAZVI,ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE PASSED BY LII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-53) - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29604 CRL.RP No. 663 of 2022 C/W CRL.RP No. 713 of 2022 IN CRL.A.NO.640/2018 DATED 21.03.2022 IN CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE DATED 23.03.2018 PASSED BY THE XXIV ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES AND XXII ADDL.C.M.M.(SCCH-26), BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.1083/2015 AND TO ACQUIT THE PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED FROM THE ABOVE CASE. THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER These revision petitions are of the year 2022. 2. This Court vide order dated 23.05.2022 suspended the sentence with a condition to pay 50% of the amount including the amount already deposited within 3 weeks from the date of order and also directed to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties. This order is not yet complied even after lapse of four years and the matter is also referred to Mediation Centre. Even before the Mediation Centre and records - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29604 CRL.RP No. 663 of 2022 C/W CRL.RP No. 713 of 2022 also disclose that this revision petitioner never turned up but the respondent was present. 3. Having considered the records, the trial Court vide order dated 23.03.2018 in C.C.No.1082/2015 has directed the revision petitioner to pay the fine amount of Rs.9,00,000/- and also with default sentence of 3 months and the same is not complied. Thereafter, the matter was taken to the appellate Court and the appellate Court also confirmed the order of the trial Court vide order dated 21.03.2022 in Crl.A.No.639/2018 and there is a concurrent finding. This Court can exercise the revision of jurisdiction, only if the order of both Courts suffers from its legality and correctness. But even in the revision also, when the order was passed to comply the conditional order, the same is not complied. The revision petitioner is not showing any interest in pursuing the matter. Even when the matters were referred to mediation, the revision petitioner was absent. Moreover, the revision petitions are not yet admitted and the revision petitioners have not - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29604 CRL.RP No. 663 of 2022 C/W CRL.RP No. 713 of 2022 shown any interest. Hence, no grounds to consider these revision petitions and accordingly, the revision petitions stand dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18