RAHUL YADAV ALIAS RAHUL KR. YADAV ALIAS CHHOTU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./7012/2026 · 2026-07-28
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22035 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22035 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:22308 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.7012 of 2026
------ Rahul Yadav @ Rahul Kr. Yadav @ Chhotu, aged about 21 years, son of Surender Yadav, resident of Village-Kitadih, Gwala Patti, P.O. & P.S.-Bagbera, Town-Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Vijoy Kr. Sinha, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 28-07-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Bagbera P.S. Case No.71 of 2025 corresponding to S.T. Case No.357 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 310(4), 310(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 25(1-B)(a), 26 & 35 of Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with co-accused persons was preparing to commit dacoity and from the possession of the petitioner, 01 country made pistol and 01 live cartridge was recovered. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is also submitted that the co-accused has already been granted bail by the co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 25.02.2026 in B.A. No.502 of 2026. It is next submitted that the charge sheet has been submitted in this case, but no witness has been examined as yet. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 14.07.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no.17 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as
discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Jamshedpur, in connection with Bagbera P.S. Case No.71 of 2025 corresponding to S.T. Case No.357 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 28/07/2026 Abhiraj/