SARITA STEEL AND INDUSTRIES LIMITED v. THE COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE, VISAKHAPATNAM
CEA/56/2007 · 2026-01-19
R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22033 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22033 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010327602007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CENTRAL EXCISE APPEALS NO: 56/2007 Between:
1. SARITA STEEL AND INDUSTRIES LIMITED, REP BY IT'S DIRECTOR KANNABABU, S/O.LATE RANGA RAO THE DIRECTOR, SARITA STEEL AND INDUSTRIES LIMITED, PONDURU ROAD, RAJAM, SRIKAKULAM. ...APPELLANT AND
1. THE COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE VISAKHAPATNAM, Central Excise The Commissisoner, Central Excise, Commissionerate-I, Central Excise Building,
...RESPONDENT
IA NO: 1 OF 2007(CEAMP 41 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 100 days in filing the present appeal in exercise of it's powers under S.5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 IA NO: 2 OF 2007(CEAMP 53 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order in original No. 33/03-04 [RP] dated 16-10-03 of the respondent IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CEAMP 368 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CEAMP 1725 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant:
1. SWAROOP OORILLA Counsel for the Respondent:
1. The Court made the following Judgment: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
There is no appearance for the appellant when the matter was called on
16.12.2025. 2. There is no appearance for the appellant even today when the matter was posted under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. As the appellant does not appear to be interested in prosecuting this Central Excise Appeal, it is accordingly, dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J
Date: 20.01.2026 MJA
195
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEALS NO: 56/2007 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
20.01.2026
MJA