APHC010329872015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1091/2015 Between: 1. K. JAGADEESWARA PILLAI, CHITTOOR DIST., S/O LATE K. SIDDAMUNI PILLAI, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCCUPATION: PROFESSOR, MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT, KANDULA SREENIVASA REDDY MEMORIAL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING (AUTONOMOUS), PRESENTLY RESIDING AT C/O K. MALLEESWARI, H.NO.18-2-227/A, ASHOK NAGAR, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 517 501. ...PETITIONER AND 1. V S S MURTHY KADAPA DIST, S/o VENKATA SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PRINCIPAL, K.S.R.M. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING (AUTONMOUS), YERRAMASUPALLI, CHINTAKOMMADINNE MANDAL, PULIVENDULA ROAD, KADAPA, Y.S.R. DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 516 003. RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.3/438, RAJAREDDY STREET, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon and punish the Respondent that is the contemnor under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act since he has been deliberately and negligently disobeying the orders of the Honourable Court passed in W.P.M.P.No.9940 of 2015 in W.P.No.7493 of 2015 on 26-03- 2015 by the Honourable Sri Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao and pass. 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENUGOPAL REDDY GODDINDLA Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. C PRAKASH REDDY The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The contempt case has been filed alleging wilful violation and disobedience of the interim orders dated 26.03.2015, passed in W.P.M.P.No.9940 of 2015 in W.P.No.7493 of 2015. 2. No representation for the petitioner. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr. C.Prakash Reddy, learned counsel for the respondents, submits that the main writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn on 09.02.2023, and therefore, the cause in the contempt case does not survive. 3. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the respondent, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 26.02.2026 SR 4 185 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE No.1091 of 2015 Date: 26.02.2026 SR