SRI LAKSHMI AUTO AGENCIES v. SHRI BUDITHI RAJASEKHER IAS
CC/3245/2024 · 2026-02-05
V Sujatha
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22025 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22025 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010312102024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3245/2024 Between:
1. SRI LAKSHMI AUTO AGENCIES, NH-5,NORTH BYE PASS ROAD, ONGOLE-523002, REP.BY ITS PROPRIETOR,VAJRALA SIVA SAMBI REDDY, S/O VEERA REDDY,AGED 73YEARS, R/O.D.NO.6-515,NORTH BY PAS ROAD, VENKATESWARA COLONY, ONGOLE,PRAKASAM
...PETITIONER AND
1. SHRI BUDITHI RAJASEKHER IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, ANDHRA PRADESH 522 237.
2. SRI M JANAKI I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI-
523238.
3. SRI C HARIKIRAN I A S, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE,GOVEMMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, NALLAPADU ROAD,GUNTUR DISTRICT.
4. SRI A SRINIVASULU, THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, ONGOLE ,PRAKASAM DISTRICT
...CONTEMNOR(S):
2
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. INAKOLLU VENKATESWARLU Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU NAGURU
2. BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3245/2024 O R D E R:
This Contempt Case is filed for willful violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.1674 of 2023 on 01.12.2023, wherein this Court passed the following order:
“…In view of the above instructions submitted by the learned Government Pleader for agriculture, since the bill amount claimed by the petitioner is an admitted bill, this Court feels it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition by directing the respondents to pay the admitted amount of Rs.40,50,000/- (Rupees forty lakh and fifty thousand only) to the petitioner within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.”
2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr. Inakollu Venkateswarlu, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order dated 01.12.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.1674 of 2023 has been complied- with by the respondents. Therefore, requested this Court to close the contempt case.
3. Recording the above submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
4
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
_______________________ SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA KS Dated 06.02.2026.
5
30
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3245/2024
DATED 06.02.2026
KS