Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22022 (DEL)

MEENAKSHI v. TARUN KUMAR

CONT.CAS(C)/210/2026 · 2026-10-09

Neena Bansal Krishna

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010037132026 + CONT.CAS(C) 210/2026 & CM APPL. 7716/2026, CM APPL. 60697/2026 MEENAKSHI .....Petitioner Through: Mrs. Upma Shrivastava, Mrs. Sarika Jain , Ms. Alka Singh, Mr. Vipul Jain, Mr. Prashant Tomar and Mrs. Neha Singh, Advs. versus TARUN KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Appearance not given. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 09.10.2026 1. Contempt Petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Section 12 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for violating the terms and conditions of the Meditation Settlement dated 22.07.2025, by the Respondent. 2. The Ld. Counsel for the Respondent states that the draft for quashing of Petition has already been mailed to the Petitioner, along with a copy of a Demand Draft. It is stated that the Respondent has always been willing to abide by the terms of the Meditation Settlement and is also willing to move the appropriate Petition for quashing of the FIR. 3. The only controversy which is being raised now, is that the draft is only of the principal amount but in the settlement, there was a default clause imposing of penalty on the Respondent in case, he failed to abide by the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2026 at 10:00:45 terms of the Settlement in filing the quashing Petition, in time. 4. Since both the parties have agreed to file the quashing petition, the present Petition is disposed of with a direction to the Respondent to file the quashing Petition within a week and that the Petitioner shall appear in the said proceedings. Moreover, whatever are the grievances in regard to absolute compliance of the Meditated Settlement, in terms of the money payable to the Petitioner, the same may be agitated before the Concerned Court. 5. The Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J OCTOBER 9, 2026/dss This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2026 at 10:00:45