$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010212712024 + CM(M) 2373/2024, CM APPL. 22972/2024 (Stay) & CM APPL. 79914/2025 (To convert the CM(M) into MAT.APP.(F.C) RAJIV KUMAR JAIN TINKU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ratnesh Bansal and Mr. Yuvraj Singh, Advocates along with Petitioner in person. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raghav Tyagi, Proxy Counsel for Ms. Deepika Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR O R D E R % 12.10.2026 1. The present Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, seeking the following reliefs: “(a) call for record of the G.P. No. 43/23 title as Rajiv Kumar Jain @ Tinku Versus The gate of NCT of Delhi and other presently pending in the court of Ms. Twinkle Wadhwa:Judge Family Court-02: Shahdam District: Kakardooma Court, Delhi. (b) To set aside the impugned order dated. 05.04.2024 passed by the court of Ms. Tiwnkle Wadhwa: Judge family court- 02:District Shahdara: Delhi in Guardianship Petition No. 43/2023 title as Rajiv Kumar Jain @ Tinku Versus The State of NCT of Delhi and others thereby to allow the application u/s.151CPC dated. 01.02.2024, application under section 12 of Guardian and Ward Act and application for direction to the Respondent no. 2 to produce the child as well as direction to the respondent no. 4 to produce the documents. (c) Any other or further order/s, which this Hon'ble Court may This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2026 at 11:12:16 deems fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner and against the respondent, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, after advancing arguments for a sufficient period of time, on instructions, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the present Petition with liberty to file an Appeal in terms of the Judgment dated 16.10.2024 in case being MAT.APPL.F.C. 126/2019 titled “Dr. Gitanjali Agarwal v. Dr. Manoj Agarwal”. 3. Leave and liberty, as sought for, are granted. 4. Accordingly, the present Petition, along with pending Application(s), if any, stands dismissed as withdraw with liberty to the Petitioner to take such steps as is available to him in law. 5. The present Petition, along with pending Application(s), if any, stands disposed of in the above terms. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. OCTOBER 12, 2026/tk/va This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2026 at 11:12:16