Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22015 (DEL)

STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI v. UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR.

CRL.M.C./5341/2024 · 2026-10-09

Vimal Kumar Yadav

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010404442024 + CRL.M.C. 5341/2024 STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with SI Deepak, PS Sarai Rohilla. versus UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV O R D E R % 09.10.2026 1. Hybrid mode. 2. This is a petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 164/2021 dated 04.04.2021 registered at P.S. Sarai Rohilla, Delhi under Sections 363/376 IPC along with Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (hereinafter referred to as „POCSO‟) and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 3. None has appeared on behalf of the Respondents. 4. It is pointed out by the learned APP for the State that there has been, invariably, no appearance on behalf of the Respondents. However, learned APP for the State submits that he does not want to pursue this petition, in This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2026 at 10:06:32 view of the fact that vide order dated 23.01.2025, the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has already quashed the FIR No. 164/2021 registered under Sections 363/376 IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act at Police Station Sarai Rohilla, Delhi. Therefore, the petitioner/State is no longer in need of verifying the age through the data available with the Respondent no. 1 i.e. Unique Identification Authority of India. 5. Learned APP for the State submits that in view of above facts, the petition has since become infructuous, the same may be disposed of accordingly. 6. Having considered the submissions made by the learned APP for the State, the petition stands disposed of having become infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J OCTOBER 9, 2026/ps This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2026 at 10:06:32