1 964 WP 2975-2020.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 964 WRIT PETITION NO. 2975 OF 2020 SHESHRAO RAMRAO MIRGE VERSUS MS SIDDHESHWAR SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA MARYADIT THRO ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MANAGER … Mr. Sanket S. Joshi h/f. Mr. Ashok A. More – Advocate for Petitioner … CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 08.01.2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. By way of the present petition, the petitioner assails the order dated 06.11.2019 passed below Exhibit O-3 by the learned Industrial Court, Aurangabad, in Complaint (ULP) No.222 of 2015, whereby the complaint filed by the petitioner came to be dismissed. 3. The learned Industrial Court rejected the complaint on the ground that there was a separate agreement at the factory level, however the petitioner has not placed the said agreement on record before this Court. Though on an earlier occasion time was sought, and even today the learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks time to place the said agreement on record. Admittedly, despite the complaint having been filed in the year 2026:BHC-AUG:585 2 964 WP 2975-2020.odt 2015 and the same came to be dismissed by the Industrial Court on 06.11.2019, and the present petition being pending since 2020, the petitioner has failed to place any such agreement before this Court. 4. In view thereof, I do not find any perversity in the order dated 06.11.2019 passed below Exhibit O-3 by the learned Industrial Court, Aurangabad, in Complaint (ULP) No.222 of 2015 . 5. However, it is made clear that, in case the petitioner subsequently finds any separate agreement, he shall be at liberty to initiate fresh proceedings before the Industrial Court. 6. All issues are kept open. 7. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ] JUDGE Pooja Kale/