IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40022 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2026 Thana- Lakho District- Begusarai ====================================================== Rahul Kumar S/o Munna Singh R/o vill - Pansala, ward no. 13, P.s.- Lakho, Distt.- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Murli Dhar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 02-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2.The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 329(3), 329(4), 303(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. 3.The learned counsel submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 21.03.2026 Nishant came to his house in a drunken condition and started abusing, accordingly he went to his house and complaint and came back home, further at 08:30 PM petitioner along with named accused persons came and Munna and Rajkumar caught him and petitioner along with Nishant assaulted by Khanti and rod causing injury on head, thereafter all accused assaulted him and looted Rs. 48,000/- along with some documents. 4.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40022 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant, it is next submitted petitioner and the informant are neighbors and having dispute relating to passage on which an altercation to place in which both sides assaulted each other, it is further submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature, as would manifest from the order impugned and petitioner is not a criminal. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail- bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court in connection with Lakho P. S. Case No. 39 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. 7. The application stands allowed. Nitesh/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T