APHC010327572021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 19683/2021 Between: 1. SCHOOL MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE,, M.P.U.P SCHOOL, MATALABUPET, SARBUJILI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY CHAIRMAN / CONVENOR SMT.UPPADA MALLESHWARI, W/O.ESHWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC- HOUSEWIFE, R/O.H.N0.4-9, MATALABUPET, SARBUJJILI, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AT SRIKAKULAM. 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AT SRIKAKULAM. 4. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER M R 0, SARUBUJJILI MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 5. MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, SARBUJILI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AT SRIKAKULAM. 7. THE MANDAL EDUCATION OFFICER, SARBUJILI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 8. MATALABUPET GRAMPANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS p. 2 PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, MATALABUPET VILLAGE, SARBUJILI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 9. THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER D E, AMADALAVALASA SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 10. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR D W A M A, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the representation dated 23.8.2021 submitted by the petitioner requesting not to allow the construction of Raithu Bharosa Kendram, Dr.YSR village Clinic/Wellness Center and Bulk Milk Cooling Unit (BMCU) in the premises of M.P.U.P School, Matalabupet, Sarubujili Mandal, Srikakulam District as the same is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to National Policy on Education, Andhra Pradesh Education Act and the provisions of Riaht to Education Act and consequently direct the respondents not to allow the construction of Raithu Bharosa Kendram, Dr.YSR village Clinic/Wellness Center and Bulk Milk Cooling Unit (BMCU) in the premises of M.P.U.P School, Matalabupet, Sarubujili Mandal, Srikakulam District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 23.8.2021 submitted by the petitioner wherein requesting not to construct the Raithu Bharosa Kendram, Dr.YSR village Clinic/Wellness Center and Bulk Milk Cooling Unit (BMCU) in the premises of M.P.U.P School, Matalabupet, Sarubujili Mandal, Srikakulam District, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To vacate the interim order dated 08.09.2021 in W.P.No. 19683 of 2021 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 p. 3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to implied proposed respondent as Smt. Veeragattapu jayalakshmi, village sarpanch, Matalabpeta village, sarubujjili mandal, srikakulam district as party/respondent 11 to main writ petition in WP 19683/2021 and pending interlocutory applications therein int he interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KRISHNA RAO M Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI (SC FOR ZPP MPP AND GRAM PAN) 2. GP FOR EDUCATION 3. GP FOR REVENUE 4. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following: ::ORDER :: The above writ petition was filed to declare the action of the respondents in not considering the representation dated 23.08.2021 submitted by the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Ms. Ch. Naga Jyothi, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that no further adjudication is required in the writ petition. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 30.03.2026 TVN p. 4 240 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 19683 of 2021 Date: 30.03.2026 TVN