IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Ex.Pet No.1886 of 2026 and connected matters. Decided on: 07.09.2026 _________________________________________________________________ 1. Ex. Pet No. 1886 of 2026 Tara Devi ....Petitioner Versus HPSFC Ltd. and Anr. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 2. Ex. Pet No. 1894 of 2026 Rajinder Singh ....Petitioner Versus HPSFC Ltd. and Anr. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 3. Ex. Pet No. 1895 of 2026 Hirti Ram ....Petitioner Versus HPSFC Ltd. and Anr. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Pankaj Sawant, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. D.S.Kainthala, Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta and Mr. Abhishek Nagta, Advocates, for the respondents in the respective execution petitions. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes - 2 - Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that after filing of these execution petitions, respondents have issued the office letters re-fixing petitioners’ pay scales, however, the petitioner still have certain grievances, therefore, they be permitted to seek appropriate remedy qua such grievances. 2. In case the petitioners have surviving grievances, it is for them to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of their surviving grievances, in accordance with law. 3. In view of above, present execution petitions to stand disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge September 7, 2026 R.Atal