APHC010334612012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 33120/2012 Between: 1. Y. NAGARAJU, SRIKAKULAM DIST, S/O SURAPPADU, AGED ABOUT YEARS, OCC: PROCESS SERVER, O/O JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE'S COURT, NARASANNAPETA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PRL DIST JUDGE SRIKAKULAM DIST 2 OT, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 2. THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NARASANNAPETA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS SECRETARY, LAW DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the impugned order dated 19-6-2012 issued by the 1st respondent in effecting recovery from the petitioner while leaving other similarly situated persons as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, unjust and violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently hold the petitioner's pay fixation is valid and made in accordance with rules with all consequential benefits and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 42168 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents not to effect recovery from the pay of the petitioner by suspending the impugned order dated 19-6-2012 issued by the 1st respondent, pending disposal of the Writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to grant leave to file a counter affidavit filed by the 1st respondent in WP. 33120/2012 in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. UMASANKAR LOKANADHAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. B VASANTHA LAKSHMI 2. GP FOR LAW & LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS 3 The Court made the following ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Raghunandan Rao) The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is desirous of withdrawing this writ petition. 2. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date: 02.02.2026 KA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 33120/2012 Date: 02.02.2026 KA