Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22008 (CHH)

SMT. KIRAN GUPTA v. CHAITRAM SATNAMI

MCC/323/2026 · 2026-06-18

Shri Radhakishan Agrawal, Shri Sanjay Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:25059-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 323 of 2026 Smt. Kiran Gupta W/o Shri Vibhutinath Gupta Aged About 46 Years R/o Five Temple Road, Power Colony Gurunanak Nagar, Supela, Bhilai, Tah., Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant versus 1 - Chaitram Satnami S/o Lt. Ramadhar Satnami Aged About 56 Years R/o Village Agar, Tahsil Dhamdha, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Vibhutinath Gupta S/o Shri Shivprasad Gupta Aged About 50 Years R/o Five Temple Road, Power Colony Gurunanak Nagar, Supela Bhilai, Tahsil And Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Vikash Kumar Gupta S/o Shri Vibhutinath Gupta Aged About 22 Years R/o Five Temple Road, Power Colony Gurunanak Nagar, Supela Bhilai, Tahsil And Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Non-Applicants For Applicant : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Tiwari, Advocate For Non-Applicants No.1 to 3 : Mr. Arvind Dubey, Advocate For State/Respondent No.4 Ms. K. Radhika, P.L. PRASHANT DEWANGAN Digitally signed by PRASHANT DEWANGAN Date: 2026.06.19 16:49:21 +0530 2 D.B:-Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal & Hon’ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order on Board 19/06/2026 1. Heard on admission. 2. This M.C.C. has been filed for restoration of FA No.466/2019, which was dismissed in default by this Court vide order dated 03/03/2026. 3. On due consideration and for the reasons assigned therein, which is duly supported by an affidavit, we are inclined to allow the same. 4. Accordingly, the instant M.C.C. is allowed and the said appeal i.e. FA No.466/2019 is restored to its original number. No order as to costs. Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Prashant