1 962 WP 2973-2020.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 962 WRIT PETITION NO. 2973 OF 2020 KISAN KACHRU TUPE DEAD THROUGH L.RS. NANUBAI KISAN TUPE AND OTHERS VERSUS SIDDHESHWAR SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA MARYADIT THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MANGER … Mr. Sanket S. Joshi h/f. Mr. Ashok A. More – Advocate for Petitioners … CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 08.01.2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners. 2. By way of the present petition, the petitioners are assailing the order dated 03.09.2019 passed below Exhibit O-3 by the learned Industrial Court, Aurangabad, in Complaint (ULP) No.141 of 2015, whereby the complaint filed by the petitioners came to be dismissed. 3. The learned Industrial Court rejected the complaint on the ground that there was a separate agreement at the factory level, however the petitioners have not placed the said agreement on record before this Court. Though on an earlier occasion time was sought, and even today the learned Counsel for the petitioners seeks time to place the said agreement on record. Admittedly, despite the complaint having been filed 2026:BHC-AUG:591 2 962 WP 2973-2020.odt in the year 2015 and having been dismissed by the Industrial Court on 03.09.2019, and the present petition being pending since 2020, the petitioners have failed to place any such agreement before this Court. 4. In view thereof, I do not find any perversity in the order dated 03.09.2019 passed below Exhibit O-3 by the learned Industrial Court, Aurangabad, in Complaint (ULP) No.141 of 2015. 5. However, it is made clear that, in case the petitioners subsequently finds any separate agreement, they shall be at liberty to initiate fresh proceedings before the Industrial Court. 6. All issues are kept open. 7. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ] JUDGE Pooja Kale/