Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22005 (HP)

KANCHAN LATA v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANR

CWP/15314/2026 · 2026-09-07

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.15313/2026 Decided on: 07.09.2026 1. CWP No. 15313/2026 Ishwra Devi …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr.. .…Respondents. 2. CWP No. 15309/2026 Anuradha …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents 3. CWP No. 15310/2026 Babita Sharma …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr.. .…Respondents 4. CWP No. 15312/2026 Sheetal Bhalla …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr.. .…Respondents 5. CWP No. 15316/2026 Asha …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents 6. CWP No. 15315/2026 Anamika Saini …Petitioner 2 Versus State of H.P. & Anr.. .…Respondents 7. CWP No. 15314/2026 Kanchan Lata …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr.. .…Respondents 8. CWP No. 15317/2026 Anupama …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents 9. CWP No. 15319/2026 Tenzin …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Ashis Kaith and Mr. Ankit Kaloti, Advocates, in both the petitions. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, in both the petitions Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 3 2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their respective representation(s) annexed with these writ petitions, seeking applicability Inder Singh Thakur & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 7th September, 2026(rohit) 2CWP No. 4830 of 2023, decided on 07.04.2025