APHC010329212013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11285/2013 Between: 1.THE DEPOT MANAGER, APSRTC,, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE HONBLE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALCUM, CUM-LABOUR COURT, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP BY ITS PRESIDING OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 2.THE DEPOT SECRETARY, APSRTC NATIONAL MAZDOOR UNION, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT REP BY SRI S.K.A.BABA, E- 600226, CONDUCTOR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the form of Writ of Certiorari (a) call for the records pertaining to and related to award passed by the Honble Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Visakhapatnam in I.D. No. 22 of 2006 dated 01.04.2009 in modifying the punishment from postponement of increments for a period of two years without cumulative effect to one increment without cumulative effect is contrary to the law and the same is liable to be set aside; and (b) consequently declare that the 2nd respondent is not entitled for relief as awarded by the Hon'ble Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Visakhapatnam in I.D. No. 22 of 2006 since the 2nd respondent committed misconduct IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 13991 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the award passed by the Hon'ble Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Visakhapatnam in I.D. No. 22 of 2006 dated 01.04.2009. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.K SRINIVASA PRASAD SC For APSRTC Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.11285 OF 2013 ORDER : 1. It is submitted that the respondent No.2 was reinstated into service and had also attained the age of superannuation on 31.05.2024. It is further submitted that the petitioner has settled the service benefits due payable to the 2nd respondent and that the 2nd respondent is presently drawing pension. 2. Recording the same, no further orders are required in the present case, and accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N KGM 3 100 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.11285 OF 2013 Dated 24.03.2026 KGM 4